In Fall 2014, I was lucky enough to be invit­ed to play Mozart’s Bas­soon Con­cer­to, K. 191 with Sac State’s Uni­ver­si­ty Orches­tra under the direc­tion of Leo Eylar. The Mozart con­cer­to is the piece that fol­lows bas­soon­ists around for their entire careers. A teacher once told me:

There are two types of audi­tions: ones that ask for the Mozart con­cer­to, and ones that ask for a con­cer­to of your choice, which means play the Mozart concerto.

I’ve worked on the Mozart con­cer­to on and off since high school, have played it for count­less audi­tions, and have per­formed it with piano accom­pa­ni­ment. But this was my first shot at play­ing it with an orches­tra, and I decid­ed to mark the occa­sion by writ­ing my own cadenzas.

Mozart wrote out caden­zas for some of his piano con­cer­ti, but none for any of his wind con­cer­ti. Per­form­ers in his day would have been expect­ed to write—or bet­ter yet, improvise—cadenzas of their own. Today, some edi­tions of Mozart’s Bas­soon Con­cer­to come with writ­ten-out caden­zas, and many oth­er caden­zas are pub­lished sep­a­rate­ly. Pri­or to last year, I had always used caden­zas writ­ten by Milan Turkovic, which are includ­ed with the Uni­ver­sal edi­tion of the con­cer­to.

My first step in cre­at­ing caden­zas of my own was to exam­ine a selec­tion of those writ­ten by oth­ers, includ­ing Bernard Garfield, Jacques Ibert, Frank Morel­li, Gabriel Pierné, and Eric Varn­er (all pub­lished by Trevco Music Pub­lish­ing); Ger­not Wolf­gang (Doblinger); Milan Turkovic (Jones—not the same as the caden­zas in the Uni­ver­sal edi­tion); and unpub­lished caden­zas by the late Cal­i­for­nia bas­soon­ist Robert Danziger. I also con­sult­ed Sarah Anne Wildey’s 2012 dis­ser­ta­tion, which presents and ana­lyzes caden­zas from eigh­teen bas­soon­ists, includ­ing Steven Braun­stein, Daryl Dur­ran, Miles Man­er, Scott Pool, William Win­stead, and Wildey her­self.1Sarah Anne Wildey, "Historical Performance Practice in Cadenzas for Mozart’s Concerto for Bassoon, K. 191 (186e)" (DMA Diss., University of Iowa, 2012). Play­ing through and pick­ing apart all of these helped me devel­op a sense of what I like (and don’t like) in a caden­za for this piece. I also lis­tened to the twen­ty-five record­ings that I own of the con­cer­to (Har­ry Sear­ing has cat­a­logued more than 100 extant record­ings), learn­ing some licks along the way.

Jotting Down Cadenza Ideas

Jotting Down Cadenza Ideas

Once I’d digest­ed all of these print­ed and record­ed caden­zas, I set about devel­op­ing some ideas of my own. I began by just impro­vis­ing in B‑flat major in a pseu­do-Mozartean style dur­ing breaks from prac­tic­ing the con­cer­to prop­er. When I came up with a chunk of music I liked, I’d write it down. After a few weeks of prac­tice ses­sions, I had about three pages’ worth of melod­ic chunks, but they weren’t in any par­tic­u­lar order. It took me quite a bit longer to fig­ure out which of these would fit togeth­er in what order, to tweak them a bit, and to come up with some extra bits of musi­cal mate­r­i­al to glue them togeth­er. I did­n’t actu­al­ly write out the caden­zas in their com­plete form until a cou­ple of days before the per­for­mance! But all of time I’d spent work­ing on them made it easy for me to play them from mem­o­ry in the concert.

In writ­ing my caden­zas, I had three goals:

  1. ref­er­ence melod­ic mate­r­i­al from the con­cer­to itself
  2. quote musi­cal mate­r­i­al from elsewhere
  3. show off some of my strengths

In the first move­ment caden­za, I took care of goal #1 right away: it begins with a mod­i­fied ver­sion of the con­cer­to’s open­ing motive, moves to the dom­i­nant, goes through anoth­er ver­sion of the open­ing motive, and then returns to the ton­ic. (Only lat­er did I real­ize that the first few mea­sures of this are sim­i­lar to the first few mea­sures of the oth­er pub­lished set of Milan Turkovic’s caden­zas). The very next pas­sage ful­fills goal #2; it’s a quo­ta­tion from the aria “Non più andrai,” from Mozart’s opera Le Nozzi di Figaro:

figaro-combined

Top: the opening of Figaro's aria "Non più andrai," from Simrock's 1796 piano/vocal score. Bottom: MM. 8-17 of my mvt. 1 cadenza

The sec­ond half of this pas­sage is almost the inver­sion of my mod­i­fied ver­sion of the open­ing motive of the con­cer­to, and com­ple­ments it well. Also, it seemed fit­ting to quote this here because the con­cer­to already has a con­nec­tion to the opera: Mozart lat­er reused the open­ing motive of the sec­ond move­ment in the aria “Por­gi amor.” “Non più andrai” (sung by Figaro) is the last aria in Act I of Le Nozzi di Figaro, while “Por­gi amor” (sung by the Count­ess) is the first aria in Act II. So, this is my own lit­tle nod to Mozart’s self-borrowing.

A sec­ond quo­ta­tion in the mvt. 1 caden­za allowed me to hit all three goals: it is based on a pas­sage from the Turkovic caden­za I’d used pre­vi­ous­ly (goal #2), it draws on mate­r­i­al from the con­cer­to itself (goal #1), and it allows me to show off two of my strengths: fast tongu­ing and high reg­is­ter facil­i­ty (goal #3). I always felt a lit­tle restrict­ed in Turkovic’s ver­sion of this passage—it’s meant to accel­er­ate, but it’s also too short to build up the kind of speed I want­ed. For my ver­sion I extend­ed it by sev­en beats, which also allowed me to push much high­er in the bas­soon’s range.

Sixteenth note passage from my mvt. 1 cadenza

MM. 24-28 of my mvt. 1 cadenza. The beginning of this passage is taken from one of Milan Turkovic's cadenzas; I extended it by seven beats to end on E-flat instead of F.

There’s actu­al­ly yet anoth­er lev­el of quo­ta­tion going on here; Turkovic took this pas­sage from a caden­za writ­ten by Roman­ian-Vien­nese musi­col­o­gist and com­pos­er Euse­bius Mandy­czews­ki (1857–1929). So, I’m quot­ing Turkovic quot­ing Mandy­czews­ki para­phras­ing Mozart.

The first idea I jot­ted down was an end­ing for my mvt. 1 caden­za (shown below), and I don’t think it ever changed. This pas­sage is solid­ly in the pur­suit of show­ing off my high range (goal #3), and as such does­n’t strict­ly fit with­in peri­od-appro­pri­ate per­for­mance prac­tice.2A 1780 fingering chart by bassoonist Pierre Cugnier goes up to high F, but there's little evidence for anyone playing stratospheric notes in performance before Carl Almenräder in the early nineteenth century But even if it goes high­er than bas­soon­ists in Mozart’s time were like­ly to have played, I feel that it’s in the spir­it of caden­zas as vehi­cles for show­ing off.

mvt-1-cadenza-ending

The ending of my Mvt. 1 cadenza, and the first idea I wrote down. I knew I wanted that high G!

This pas­sage works chro­mat­i­cal­ly up to an extend­ed high F (top of the tre­ble clef staff). And just when you think that’s high enough, it con­tin­ues up chro­mat­i­cal­ly to G. In per­for­mance I added to the decep­tion by putting a long decrescen­do on the F, as if fad­ing away, before com­ing back up to forte to con­tin­ue up to G. In the writ­ten-out ver­sion of my caden­zas (down­load­able below), I’ve pro­vid­ed an alter­nate end­ing for those who’d rather avoid the high G.

Watch the first move­ment cadenza:

My process for writ­ing the sec­ond move­ment caden­za was much the same. But in keep­ing with the move­men­t’s char­ac­ter, I focused on beau­ty much more than vir­tu­os­i­ty. Also, not want­i­ng to go over­board with quo­ta­tion, I used only one motive from the con­cer­to itself and did­n’t quote any oth­er works.

mvt-2-cadenza-quotation

MM. 4-7 of my mvt. 2 cadenza

The end of this pas­sage comes from the move­men­t’s reca­pit­u­la­tion, although I’ve tak­en it down an octave here. I use the same motive, mod­i­fied only so that it descends every time, to get there from what had come before.

As far as I know, the rest of my Mvt. 2 caden­za is orig­i­nal mate­r­i­al (although it’s cer­tain­ly pos­si­ble that parts of it were uncon­scious­ly inspired by some of the many caden­zas I read through at the begin­ning of my process). Here’s the sec­ond move­ment cadenza:

Download the Cadenzas

If you’d like to try my caden­zas out for your­self, you can down­load a PDF below. If you use them in per­for­mance, please let me know!

Wells-Mozart-Cadenzas.pdf (Released under a Cre­ative Com­mons BY-NC-SA 3.0 license)


Notes:

  • 1
    Sarah Anne Wildey, “His­tor­i­cal Per­for­mance Prac­tice in Caden­zas for Mozart’s Con­cer­to for Bas­soon, K. 191 (186e)” (DMA Diss., Uni­ver­si­ty of Iowa, 2012).
  • 2
    A 1780 fin­ger­ing chart by bas­soon­ist Pierre Cug­nier goes up to high F, but there’s lit­tle evi­dence for any­one play­ing stratos­pher­ic notes in per­for­mance before Carl Almen­räder in the ear­ly nine­teenth century
  • 1
    Sarah Anne Wildey, “His­tor­i­cal Per­for­mance Prac­tice in Caden­zas for Mozart’s Con­cer­to for Bas­soon, K. 191 (186e)” (DMA Diss., Uni­ver­si­ty of Iowa, 2012).
  • 2
    A 1780 fin­ger­ing chart by bas­soon­ist Pierre Cug­nier goes up to high F, but there’s lit­tle evi­dence for any­one play­ing stratos­pher­ic notes in per­for­mance before Carl Almen­räder in the ear­ly nine­teenth century

Categories:

6 Responses

  1. Your arti­cle is MOST inter­est­ing. You cer­tain­ly left no stone unturned. I had enjoyed hear­ing the caden­zas many times before read­ing this and under­stand and like them even bet­ter now. Thanks for sharing.

  2. Hey, on your third footnote:

    You’re right, it’s a bit crazy that they go up to high F (if I’m cor­rect it’s on a 5 key instru­ment — no vent keys). How­ev­er, Antoine Dard­’s Op.2 (1752) bas­soon sonatas have a high D com­ing out of nowhere in them (he was one of the paris opera bassoonists). 

    With my Heirich Grenser (8 keys) instru­ment (he was mak­ing bas­soons in the 1770s into the 1820s) I can get up to high D and on a good day high Eb. Like­ly the instru­ment would have been more pop­u­lar in Dres­den dur­ing Mozart’s ear­ly life than any­where else, how­ev­er by the lat­er years they were going all over the place. 

    So, yes, high G not exact­ly his­tor­i­cal­ly appro­pri­ate, but not as far off as you might think.

  3. Thanks for tak­ing the time to doc­u­ment your process and I real­ly enjoyed your per­for­mances. Two thoughts (I’m being over-crit­i­cal here to fur­ther discussion):

    1. In terms of extremes in reg­is­ter I’d per­son­al­ly think less about what is styl­is­ti­cal­ly cor­rect for the era and more in terms of impli­ca­tions to the greater work — for exam­ple does hit­ting extreme reg­is­ter notes dimin­ish the emo­tive effect of notes scored by the com­pos­er lat­er (or ear­li­er on re-lis­ten­ing) in the piece.

    2. There is some extend­ed sequenc­ing of motif that I felt goes on a lit­tle long (starts to feel like a tech­ni­cal exer­cise). I feel that this could be avoid­ed by either smooth development/transformation of motif or a free/vocal end­ing to the phrase, or a pro­gres­sive­ly more strong­ly felt rhyth­mic pulse through that section.

    Dis­claimer:
    My improvisation/writing is learned from a wider range of gen­res than just Euro­pean con­cert music and my orches­tra­tion knowl­edge is learned main­ly from orches­tral music writ­ten 100+ years after this piece, so my per­cep­tion won’t be unique­ly lim­it­ed to my taste in Mozart’s style.

    • Thanks for your thoughts! (And sor­ry to be so slow in replying).

      1. The high­est note Mozart wrote in the solo part is a B‑flat above mid­dle C. It occurs twice in the first move­ment, so the Mvt. 1 caden­za fol­lows them. The near­by As and Gs do occur in lat­er move­ments, but I don’t think any of those instances hinge on an extreme of range for emo­tive effect.

      2. Fair enough! This was my first crack at writ­ing caden­zas, and I’m not much of a com­pos­er. I’m sure there are more ele­gant ways to tran­si­tion between some of my motives, and prob­a­bly also just some judi­cious edit­ing to be done of the motives them­selves. But you also give some inter­est­ing inter­pre­tive ideas for how to improve the real­iza­tion of what I’ve already got—thanks!

Leave a Reply